I was driving recently, doing the thing every New Zealander does at some point, reading personalised plates. NIX UTE. MY Q7. And then a few that had nothing to do with the car at all, an occupation, a nickname, a personality trait stamped onto metal.
It got me thinking about a distinction that turns out to matter a lot more than plate design.
Some plates are tied to the car. The moment you sell that ute or trade in that Q7, the plate loses its meaning. It was never really about you, it was a label for the vehicle. Other plates are tied to the driver. Change cars, and the plate goes with them, because it was describing a person, not a possession.
The swap test
Here’s the question worth sitting with: if you did the equivalent swap with your identity, if you removed the job, the title, the sport, the role, tomorrow, what’s left on the plate?
For a lot of high performers, especially athletes and especially coaches, the honest answer is uncomfortable. The identity was welded to the role. Not attached to it, fused with it. Which is fine right up until the role ends, whether by choice, injury, redundancy, or retirement, and there’s a genuine question of who’s driving.
I heard the Australian sports psychologist Ben Crowe talk about exactly this with athletes: who are you separate from the sport you play, once you stop? If you haven’t done any thinking on that before the day arrives, the day arrives anyway.
What the research actually shows
This isn’t just a nice metaphor, it’s a documented phenomenon in sport psychology called athletic identity foreclosure. The concept describes people who commit to an occupation or role without first exploring other possible identities, a pattern rooted in Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development.
The consequences aren’t trivial. Research consistently links a strong, exclusive athletic identity and identity foreclosure to lower career maturity and delayed career development, meaning the athlete hasn’t built the scaffolding for what comes next because there was never a “next” in the plan. Full time athletes who engage only in their sport are particularly at risk, largely because they haven’t built a support network outside it.
And when the role does end, especially unexpectedly, the fallout is measurable. Involuntary retirement from sport, particularly following injury, is consistently associated with increased psychological distress, anxiety, and depression.
The encouraging finding sits on the other side of this. Studies suggest that redefining your sense of self well before a career actually ends may protect your identity through the transition. In other words, this isn’t fixed. The work can happen before the plate needs to change, not in the panic afterwards.
It’s not just athletes
Swap “athlete” for “coach,” “CEO,” “firefighter,” “founder,” and the pattern holds. Anyone whose sense of self runs entirely through a single role is carrying the same exposure, just with a different retirement date. Burnout, the identity crisis that follows redundancy, the coach who’s quietly running on empty, it’s often the same root cause wearing a different uniform.
The protective factor isn’t quitting the thing you love or holding it at arm’s length. It’s building a plate that describes the driver, not just the car. Values, relationships, curiosities, other roles you play, the things about you that would still be true if the job title disappeared tomorrow.
Worth asking yourself
If your plate came off your current car right now, what would still be readable? If the answer is mostly job titles and results, that’s not a failure, it’s useful information, and it’s far easier to work with now than after an ending you didn’t choose.
Is coaching right for me? Find out here